I. Executive Summary

NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE: SMR) occupies a critical, yet volatile, position in the global advanced nuclear energy sector. The company’s core asset is the NuScale Power Module™ (NPM), a small modular reactor (SMR) based on proven pressurized water-cooled reactor technology.¹ NuScale holds a distinctive regulatory advantage as the developer of the first and only SMR design to receive design approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).¹ This achievement establishes a significant competitive barrier to entry for rivals.

The investment thesis surrounding NuScale centers on the tension between this established regulatory “moat” and ongoing commercial execution risks inherent in First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) deployment. The NRC certification, which now includes approval for the uprated 77 MWe NPM design ³, is a necessary foundation for global sales. However, this technical readiness was insufficient to ensure the commercial success of the flagship Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) with Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS), which was terminated in November 2023 due to escalating costs and challenges regarding commercial viability.⁴

This termination spurred a critical strategic pivot. NuScale has successfully shifted its focus toward securing international government-backed projects (e.g., Romania, Poland) and tapping into high-value, high-demand industrial markets, particularly for powering massive Artificial Intelligence (AI) data centers.⁵ The current trajectory relies on the company’s ability to convert engineering contracts into firm construction orders.

Key Financial Highlights (Q3 2025)

Operationally, NuScale remains in the pre-commercial phase, characterized by high expenditures. The company reported a significant earnings miss in Q3 2025, with an Earnings Per Share (EPS) loss of -$1.85 and a revenue shortfall.⁶ However, the company mitigated immediate liquidity concerns by generating $475.2 million in gross proceeds through an At-the-Market (ATM) offering, resulting in a robust cash and investment position of approximately $753.8 million.⁷ This liquidity provides a crucial financial runway to bridge the gap until major Final Investment Decisions (FIDs) are reached and module production commences.

Strategic Outlook

The immediate commercial outlook is heavily dependent on the progression of the RoPower project in Romania, which is undergoing Phase 2 Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED). The Final Investment Decision for this project is currently anticipated in late 2026 or early 2027.⁶ Concurrently, the conversion of non-binding technology selections—such as the 24-module deployment identified for Standard Power data centers—into firm, binding contracts by the end of 2025 is a critical prerequisite for manufacturing scale-up.⁵

The analysis of the CFPP termination reveals that achieving NRC certification, while groundbreaking, is insufficient for commercial success. The economic viability of FOAK SMR technology is primarily constrained by financing, competitive pricing relative to cheap gas, and market acceptance risk, rather than technical or regulatory hurdles.⁴ Consequently, NuScale’s successful redirection toward markets where the premium for 24/7 carbon-free, dispatchable power (such as in geopolitical energy security or AI data center operations) is justifiable, is essential for its long-term viability.⁹

Feature	Specification	Implication
Generating Capacity (Uprated)	77 MWe per module (250 MWt) 1	Supports VOYGR plant scalability (308 MWe to 924 MWe).
Regulatory Status	First and only SMR design approved by U.S. NRC 1	Significant regulatory advantage and certification lead time.
Safety System	Passive Safety (Gravity, Convection) 9	Eliminates reliance on external power/operator action for prolonged cooling.
Core Application Range	Electricity, Process Heat, Desalination, Hydrogen 1	Addresses diverse industrial and decarbonization needs, expanding market size.

II. Corporate Profile and Regulatory Foundation

2.1. Company Overview and Strategic Alliances

NuScale Power originated from research conducted at Oregon State University, commercializing its technology and eventually becoming the world’s first publicly traded SMR technology provider.⁵ The company operates under an integrated partnership structure. Fluor Corporation, a global leader in engineering, procurement, fabrication, and construction (EPFC), serves as both the EPFC lead and NuScale’s majority shareholder, having made a significant investment in 2011.¹² This relationship is critical, linking NuScale’s design expertise with Fluor’s global execution capabilities.

The company has also cultivated a global supply chain essential for factory fabrication and deployment. Key international partners include Doosan Enerbility, Ltd. (Strategic Supplier and Investor), Samsung C&T Corporation (Contractor/Investor), and BWXT Canada (Module Fabrication).¹² These relationships are vital for achieving the economies of scale and standardized manufacturing necessary for cost reduction in SMR deployment.⁹

2.2. U.S. NRC Regulatory Milestones: The Core Competitive Moat

The most significant competitive advantage held by NuScale is its foundational regulatory status with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NuScale Power Module (NPM) was the first SMR design certified by the NRC, receiving its Final Safety Evaluation Report in 2020 for the 50 MWe configuration.³

Subsequently, through advanced testing and value engineering, NuScale concluded that the technology could safely generate 25 percent more power. Consequently, an uprated 77 MWe design was submitted for approval in January 2023.¹⁰ This uprated SMR design received Standard Design Approval (SDA) from the NRC in May 2025, completing the technical review ahead of schedule and under budget.³ The rigor of the NRC review process involved resolving significant technical issues in design areas such as containment safety analysis and boron redistribution during passive cooling modes.² The successful resolution of these complex issues validates the fundamental safety case for future regulators globally.

This established regulatory certification functions as a powerful geopolitical asset for NuScale and its commercial partners. The NRC SDA sets a global benchmark, allowing NuScale and its commercial partner, ENTRA1 Energy, to present a de-risked technology to foreign regulatory bodies. By satisfying the world’s most stringent nuclear regulator, the US certification streamlines the international licensing process, exemplified by the work undertaken by the Science and Technology Center in Ukraine for SMR Licensing Gap Analysis.¹² This positions the technology as the most near-term American SMR power solution available for global delivery via ENTRA1 Energy Plants.³

2.3. Commercialization Partnership Structure

The deployment and commercialization structure are managed through an exclusive global partnership with ENTRA1 Energy.¹² ENTRA1 Energy is responsible for the distribution, development, financing, ownership, and operation of SMR plants powered by the NPM.¹³ This arrangement allows NuScale to pursue an Asset-Light model, focusing its internal resources on core competencies: technology refinement, licensing, and IP monetization. ENTRA1, in turn, leverages NuScale’s certified technology to meet diverse energy consumer needs globally, including power production, hydrogen, desalination, and process heat.¹³

III. Core Technology and Product Portfolio

3.1. The NuScale Power Module™ (NPM): Technical Description

The NPM is a proprietary pressurized water reactor housed within a compact, cylindrical containment vessel measuring 76 feet by 15 feet.¹ Its design integrates the reactor core, steam generator, and pressurizer into a single unit, enabling factory fabrication and modular transport.⁹ The module weighs approximately 700 tons and is shipped in three segments via truck, rail, or barge.¹

The cornerstone of the NPM’s safety case is its advanced passive safety system. Unlike traditional nuclear reactors that rely on active components (pumps, valves, external power) or immediate operator intervention for cooling, the NPM relies on natural physical processes like gravity and convection.⁹ This system ensures that in the event of a shutdown, the module can cool itself for a minimum of seven days without requiring any external AC or DC electrical power, or human action.² This inherent safety feature not only simplifies operations but also reduces the necessary size of the emergency planning zone (EPZ), allowing for greater flexibility in plant siting closer to load centers.¹

3.2. VOYGR™ Power Plant Configurations and Scalability

The modularity of the NPM is leveraged in the VOYGR™ power plant designs, which are scalable to match specific power demands.⁵ Standard configurations include the VOYGR-4 (308 MWe capacity), the VOYGR-6 (462 MWe capacity), and the largest VOYGR-12 (924 MWe capacity).⁵

This flexible capacity, which falls within the SMR standard range of 5 to 300 megawatts per module ⁹, coupled with the small site boundary requirements, makes the NuScale technology highly optimized for locations where transmission infrastructure is insufficient or where space is constrained.¹ Standardization and factory fabrication are projected to significantly reduce the construction time for a VOYGR plant to roughly 36 months, enhancing project predictability compared to custom-built traditional reactors.¹

3.3. Diversified Applications Beyond Electricity

The NPM’s capability to provide always-on, 24/7 power generation extends far beyond traditional electrical baseload.¹ The highly dispatchable, carbon-free heat generated by the NPM is strategically positioned for several high-value industrial applications, expanding the addressable market for NuScale. These applications include district heating, process heat for industrial use, commercial-scale hydrogen production, and water desalination.¹ Simulations indicate that a single NPM could yield approximately 150 million gallons of clean water per day, and a VOYGR-12 plant could provide enough power for 400,000 homes while simultaneously producing 200 metric tons of hydrogen per day.¹¹ This multi-application capability allows the technology to target complex industrial needs, where energy costs are secondary to operational security and decarbonization goals.

IV. Business Model, Revenue Structure, and Commercialization Pathway

4.1. Revenue Generation and the IP-Centric Model

NuScale Power’s financial model is designed to be intellectual property (IP)-centric and minimizes direct capital expenditures associated with construction and ownership. The business generates revenue through a combination of high-margin services, engineering support, and licensing fees.¹⁴

Cash revenue generation is phased and begins well before the Commercial Operation Date (COD). Services and IP licensing revenues are forecast to begin approximately five years before COD, while high-volume module production revenues are expected to start roughly three years before operations commence.¹⁴

This model is currently visible in the company’s recent financial results. The reported revenue of $8.24 million in the third quarter of 2025 ⁶ was predominantly generated by ongoing engineering and licensing fees. Specifically, $7.8 million was attributed to work performed by Fluor for Phase 2 of the Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) study for the RoPower Doicești power plant in Romania.¹⁵

4.2. Commercialization Timeline and Milestones

The critical inflection point for NuScale’s transition from an R&D/service entity to a manufacturing revenue generator is the Final Investment Decision (FID) by the plant owner/customer. The FID represents the moment when firm, binding contracts for module delivery are secured and construction funding is fully committed.

The most advanced commercial milestone is the FID for the RoPower project, which, based on ongoing engineering work, is anticipated in late 2026 or early 2027.⁶ Delays in achieving such FIDs or converting letters of intent into binding contracts pose a significant risk to NuScale’s financial structuring and projected growth curve.¹⁵

4.3. The Dual Function of Engineering Contracts

The structured engineering work required by customers, such as the multi-phase FEED contracts being executed for RoPower, serves a purpose beyond immediate revenue generation. These detailed engineering phases, often executed with global EPFC partners like Fluor ⁸, are designed to address the primary cause of the CFPP failure: cost uncertainty. The termination of the CFPP was driven by uncontrolled cost escalation.⁴

By mandating detailed FEED work, the process produces an “updated cost estimate and schedule” and all necessary safety and security analyses before the customer commits to the final investment decision.⁸ This structured due diligence minimizes future cost overrun risk for the customer, thereby increasing the probability of a positive FID and securing a firm contract, a necessary departure from the initial high-risk demonstration strategy.

V. Growth Strategy and Market Opportunities

5.1. Strategic Pivot and Target Market Shift

Following the termination of the CFPP, NuScale executed a decisive strategic pivot, moving away from utility customers in cheap natural gas markets (which struggled to justify the FOAK SMR price point) toward entities with critical, non-negotiable energy demands.⁴ The current growth strategy targets two primary high-value segments: international energy security initiatives backed by government funding, and the burgeoning, energy-intensive AI data center market.

5.2. Addressing High-Density Energy Demand: The AI Data Center Nexus

The explosive energy demands associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and cloud computing infrastructure represent NuScale’s most compelling domestic market opportunity. AI data centers are projected to consume 945 terawatt-hours annually by 2030, a figure equivalent to the entire electricity consumption of Japan.⁹ These facilities require 24/7, high-capacity, carbon-free, and highly reliable dispatchable power—a profile perfectly suited to nuclear energy.⁹

SMRs offer a compelling solution because data center operators, unlike traditional municipal utilities, often possess access to vast pools of private capital and prioritize operational security and carbon mandate compliance over traditional levelized cost of energy (LCOE) comparisons. The power cost is often secondary to fixed, guaranteed energy availability. This decreased sensitivity to upfront capital costs, coupled with the immense, reliable power needs, significantly increases the likelihood of firm contracts. NuScale’s technology has already been selected by Standard Power for two data center facilities in Ohio and Pennsylvania, requiring 24 modules, validating this strategic focus.⁵

5.3. International Expansion and Geopolitical Leverage

International markets are actively seeking non-intermittent, secure, and decarbonized baseload power solutions, often leveraging nuclear technology for geopolitical energy independence.¹⁸

RoPower, Romania

The RoPower project in Romania, which is in the FEED Phase 2 with Fluor, is positioned to establish the country as the first SMR operator in Europe.⁸ This project receives substantial support from the U.S. government, including grants through the Partnership for Transatlantic Energy and Climate Cooperation (P-TECC), underscoring its role in regional energy security and decarbonization.⁸

Poland and North America

The partnership with KGHM Polska Miedź SA in Poland aims for the deployment of a VOYGR-12 plant (924 MWe) as early as 2029, catering to large-scale industrial customers.⁵ Domestically, NuScale secured a landmark agreement in September 2025 with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for potential SMR deployment of up to 6 gigawatts, highlighting a large-scale utility pipeline that could maximize factory utilization.⁵

VI. Project Portfolio Review and Case Studies

6.1. Case Study: The CFPP Termination – Lessons in FOAK Deployment

The mutual termination of the Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) with UAMPS in November 2023 serves as the primary learning exercise for NuScale and the broader SMR industry. The failure was economic, not technical, resulting from deteriorating financial conditions and escalating costs.⁴ The decision to select UAMPS, a collective of municipals lacking prior nuclear experience and operating in a market dominated by cheap natural gas and growing wind capacity, magnified the challenges.⁴

The critical lesson extracted is that the traditional sequence—licensing a design and then proceeding with construction—is often too slow and expensive for today’s market dynamics.⁴ Successful initial deployment requires either massive government subsidy or the targeting of customers, like AI data centers, where the value derived from 24/7 dispatchability and security outweighs the high initial FOAK costs.⁴

6.2. Flagship Project I: RoPower, Romania – De-risking Execution

The RoPower project, targeting a 462 MWe VOYGR-6 plant, is now the flagship project driving NuScale’s near-term commercial path.⁸ A significant de-risking element of this deployment is the utilization of the former coal-fired Doicești Power Station site.⁸ Converting brownfield sites like Doicești is a powerful strategic advantage for nuclear siting. These sites already possess essential infrastructure, including transmission lines, rail access, and a local skilled workforce accustomed to power generation.⁸ This strategy circumvents the time-consuming and expensive process of greenfield development and mitigates typical community opposition associated with new industrial footprints, shortening critical lead times and improving schedule predictability—a direct response to the delays experienced during the CFPP planning phase.

6.3. Advanced Pipeline Status

NuScale is prioritizing multi-module commitments to maximize the benefits of factory fabrication and achieve economy of scale. The current pipeline reflects this strategy:

Table: Status of Key Commercial Pipeline Projects

Project/Partner	Location/Customer Type	Configuration/Capacity	Current Status/Timeline
CFPP (UAMPS)	Idaho, USA / Municipal Utility	VOYGR-6 (462 MWe – planned)	TERMINATED (November 2023). Highlighted FOAK economic risks.4
RoPower Nuclear	Romania / State Utility	VOYGR-6 (462 MWe)	In FEED Phase 2; FID expected late 2026/early 2027. Flagship international project.6
KGHM Polska Miedź SA	Poland / Industrial Customer	VOYGR-12 (924 MWe)	Partnership aiming for deployment by 2029.5
Standard Power	Ohio/Pennsylvania, USA / Data Centers	24 Modules (Two Facilities)	Technology selected; represents major domestic pipeline opportunity driven by AI demand.5
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)	USA / Major Utility	Up to 6 GW potential capacity	Landmark agreement signed September 2025.5

VII. Financial Health and Risk Assessment

7.1. Q3 2025 Financial Performance Review

NuScale’s Q3 2025 financial results reflected the significant expenses associated with operating a high-tech development company prior to commercial scale. The company reported an Earnings Per Share (EPS) loss of -$1.85, dramatically exceeding the forecasted loss of -$0.13, and revenue of $8.24 million, which fell short of the estimated $11.55 million.⁶ This highlights the considerable burn rate required to sustain R&D, licensing, and global marketing activities in the face of limited pre-COD revenue streams.

7.2. Liquidity and Capital Runway Analysis

Despite the operational losses, NuScale successfully bolstered its liquidity position. Through a strategic At-the-Market (ATM) offering, the company generated $475.2 million in gross proceeds.⁷ This capital raise resulted in a strong cash, cash equivalents, and investment position totaling approximately $753.8 million at the end of the quarter.⁷

This substantial cash reserve is fundamentally important for sustaining the company through the volatile pre-commercial phase, insulating NuScale from the volatility of its current service revenue. This liquidity provides necessary operating runway, particularly as analysts have noted potential delays in securing hard contracts extending into 2026.¹⁶ Critically, this capital provides management with strategic leverage during contract negotiations for forthcoming FIDs, allowing the company to avoid accepting potentially unprofitable deals solely for the purpose of securing a firm order, thus mitigating the commercial risk factors that doomed the CFPP.

7.3. Major Commercial and Operational Risks

As highlighted in corporate disclosures, NuScale faces several material risks inherent to the FOAK nature of its business ¹⁵:

• Cost and Competition: The possibility remains that the final cost of electricity generated from NPMs will not be cost-competitive against established or subsidized energy sources.¹⁵
• Contractual Delays: The market for commercial SMRs is not yet fully established. Delays in converting memoranda of understanding into binding contracts, or delays in the development and manufacturing timelines for NPMs, could jeopardize the commercialization schedule.¹⁵
• Political and Public Perception: The company operates in a politically sensitive environment. Public perception of nuclear energy, along with evolving governmental laws and the risk of loss of governmental funding, remains a significant operational and financial uncertainty.¹⁵
• Partnership Dependency: The company’s strategic decision to rely heavily on ENTRA1 Energy and Fluor for project development, financing, and execution introduces dependency risk related to those partners’ capacity and ability to meet specific partnership milestones.¹⁵

VIII. Competitive Landscape and Industry Dynamics

8.1. U.S. and Allied Competitor Comparison

While NuScale maintains the lead in regulatory certification within the U.S. light water SMR field, key competitors are rapidly advancing execution milestones, challenging NuScale’s first-mover advantage.

• GE-Hitachi (BWRX-300): The BWRX-300 design is securing critical execution leads. Ontario Power Generation (OPG) in Canada has selected the BWRX-300 for its SMR project, aiming for a construction start in 2025 and a target operation date for the first of four units in 2028.²⁰ Domestically, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has accepted a construction permit application for this design.¹⁸
• Advanced Reactor Developers: Other developers, such as X-energy (Xe-100) and TerraPower (Natrium), are pursuing advanced non-light water reactor designs optimized for high-temperature industrial heat and molten salt technology.⁹ These technologies target specific industrial niches but currently trail NuScale in regulatory clearance and near-term commercial viability.

8.2. The Global SMR Race and Geopolitics

Globally, the race to deploy SMRs is highly geopolitical. Although the U.S. leads in regulatory approval, the nation lags behind major global competitors: Russia has already deployed a floating SMR in Pevek, and China operates an SMR in Shidao Bay.¹⁸ This context underscores the urgency for NuScale to translate its regulatory status into tangible, operational plants in allied countries. The U.S. and 24 other nations have pledged to triple global nuclear power capacity by 2050 to provide zero-emission firm power, indicating robust governmental support for the sector.¹⁸

8.3. The Pressure to Convert Regulatory Lead into Execution

The most pressing competitive risk for NuScale is the potential erosion of its regulatory lead if competitors achieve “First-to-Operate” status in key allied markets. For instance, if OPG successfully commissions the BWRX-300 in Canada by 2028, that operational plant will provide a powerful commercial reference for other potential customers. This physical validation of technology, financing, and construction schedules could significantly influence Final Investment Decisions globally, even for customers considering NuScale’s already-certified design. This dynamic necessitates that NuScale quickly finalizes its RoPower project and secures the initiation of construction on domestic data center deployments within the 2026 timeframe.

8.4. Addressing the Financing Gap

A pervasive industry challenge is the “financing gap.” Despite the clear demand for firm, clean power in emerging markets, institutions that fund large-scale infrastructure are often unprepared to finance nuclear technology. This lack of readiness stems from limited in-house expertise and historical prohibitions on supporting nuclear projects.¹⁸ While the World Bank has lifted its longstanding ban on financing nuclear projects, signaling a potential shift, this policy change must be quickly followed by specific project financing frameworks to accelerate adoption in Asia and Africa.¹⁸

IX. Conclusion and Outlook

NuScale Power Corporation maintains a uniquely valuable position in the global energy transition, underpinned by its proprietary and NRC-certified NuScale Power Module technology. The company’s core competitive advantages include the exclusive U.S. regulatory clearance, the inherent safety and scalability of its passive SMR design, and a strategic pivot toward high-value, cost-insensitive markets, notably AI data centers and geopolitical energy security projects.

However, the commercial trajectory remains subject to high execution and financing risks, as demonstrated by the CFPP failure. The path to profitability depends critically on converting its extensive pipeline into firm, multi-module contracts that enable the necessary factory scale and cost reduction. The pivotal near-term focus must be on finalizing the RoPower FID (expected late 2026/early 2027) and securing binding agreements for its domestic data center pipeline. Successful execution of these milestones is essential to maintain the regulatory lead against accelerating global competitors who are aggressively pursuing “first-to-operate” status.

X. Disclaimer

This report has been prepared solely for informational and analytical purposes, based on publicly available corporate filings, news reports, and industry data. This document is not intended to constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities of NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE: SMR) or any related entity.

The advanced nuclear energy sector is highly regulated, capital-intensive, and subject to significant technical, commercial, political, and market risks. Prospective investors should conduct their own thorough independent due diligence, evaluate the specific risks associated with First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) technology deployment, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Works cited

1. The NuScale Power Module, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.nuscalepower.com/products/nuscale-power-module
2. NuScale Small Modular Reactor Design Certification – Federal Register, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/19/2023-00729/nuscale-small-modular-reactor-design-certification
3. Uprated NuScale SMR design gets US approval – World Nuclear News, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/uprated-nuscale-smr-design-gets-us-approval
4. Lessons learned from the recently cancelled NuScale-UAMPS project – Clean Air Task Force, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.catf.us/2023/11/lessons-learned-recently-cancelled-nuscale-uamps-project/
5. NuScale Power Corporation (SMR): A Deep Dive into the Future of Nuclear Energy, accessed December 14, 2025, https://markets.financialcontent.com/wral/article/predictstreet-2025-12-10-nuscale-power-corporation-smr-a-deep-dive-into-the-future-of-nuclear-energy
6. Earnings call transcript: Nuscale’s Q3 2025 earnings miss sparks stock slide By Investing.com, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-nuscales-q3-2025-earnings-miss-sparks-stock-slide-93CH-4340895
7. NuScale Power Corp (NYSE:SMR) Reports Q3 2025 Earnings Miss Despite Major Project Pipeline Expansion – Chartmill, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.chartmill.com/news/SMR/Chartmill-37311-NuScale-Power-Corp-NYSESMR-Reports-Q3-2025-Earnings-Miss-Despite-Major-Project-Pipeline-Expansion
8. RoPower and Fluor sign FEED 2 contract for SMR project – World Nuclear News, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/ropower-and-fluor-corporation-sign-feed-2-contract
9. Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Power the AI Revolution 2025 – Introl, accessed December 14, 2025, https://introl.com/blog/smr-nuclear-power-ai-data-centers-2025
10. NuScale Builds Upon Unparalleled Licensing Progress With Second Standard Design Approval Application Submittal, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.nuscalepower.com/press-releases/2023/nuscale-builds-upon-unparalleled-licensing-progress-with-second-standard-design-approval
11. NuScale Power – Wikipedia, accessed December 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NuScale_Power
12. Strategic Partners | NuScale Power, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.nuscalepower.com/about/strategic-partners
13. ENTRA1 and NuScale Partnership, accessed December 14, 2025, https://interactive.nuscalepower.com/nuscale/nuscale-entra1-partnership
14. Investor-Presentation.pdf – NuScale Power, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.nuscalepower.com/hubfs/Website/Investors/Investor-Presentation.pdf?hsLang=en
15. NuScale Power Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Presentation, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.nuscalepower.com/hubfs/Website/Investors/2025/SMR-3Q25-Presentation.pdf?hsLang=en
16. SMR Stock Plunge: Time to Buckle Up? – StocksToTrade, accessed December 14, 2025, https://stockstotrade.com/news/nuscale-power-corporation-smr-news-2025_12_11/
17. NuScale Power and the Race to Fuel AI Data Centers with Small Modular Reactors, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.kavout.com/market-lens/nuscale-power-and-the-race-to-fuel-ai-data-centers-with-small-modular-reactors
18. [Sept 2025 Update] Which advanced nuclear models are likely to hit emerging markets first?, accessed December 14, 2025, https://energyforgrowth.org/article/sept-2025-update-which-advanced-nuclear-models-are-likely-to-hit-emerging-markets-first/
19. NuScale Power and RoPower Announce Signing of the Contract for Phase 1 of Front-End Engineering and Design Work for First SMR Power Plant in Romania, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.nuscalepower.com/press-releases/2023/nuscale-and-ropower-announce-signing-of-the-contract-for-phase-1-engineering-and-design-work
20. The Global Race for Advanced Nuclear Is On – Clean Air Task Force, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.catf.us/resource/global-race-advanced-nuclear/